linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: clock: drop NUM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <944dfd5c97e44d8cff3e576e0fa4a711.sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:45:21 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, upstream@...oha.com, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: clock: drop NUM_CLOCKS define for EN7581

Quoting Christian Marangi (2025-01-13 14:17:49)
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 01:53:46PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > 
> > Please resubmit the entire patchset. It doesn't compile.
> 
> Hope I don't get annoying and sorry for this extra mail.

No worries.

> 
> I can't repro the compile error, it seems patch 1 of this series wasn't
> applied and changes were tested only with patch 2?
> 
> Patch 2 depends on patch 1 as we drop the define.
> 

I applied the first patch, but on top of v6.13-rc1 like all other
patches that don't tell me their base.

What's the base of the patch series? Please resend with a cover letter
and use --base=<commitish> when formatting the patch series. When I
applied the first patch I got this diffstat

 drivers/clk/clk-en7523.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

so I suspect I'm missing something in clk-fixes for this patch series.
Please call out dependencies in the cover letter.