[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bea75a31-2778-4065-ac50-1a9e75cde2da@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 15:55:05 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/ftrace: Fix ftracetest test cases
On 1/7/25 05:10, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> Here is a couple of patches to fix issues. I think mount_options.tc's one
> is a real bug(I'm not sure how it worked), but another one is an enhancement
> for (my) execution environment.
> Anyway, those should go through kselftests tree.
>
> Thank you,
> ---
>
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) (2):
> selftests/ftrace: Fix to use remount when testing mount GID option
> selftests/ftrace: Make uprobe test more robust against binary name
>
>
> .../ftrace/test.d/00basic/mount_options.tc | 8 ++++----
> .../ftrace/test.d/dynevent/add_remove_uprobe.tc | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
I applied these two patches to linux-kselftest next fro Linux 6.14-rc1
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists