linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: dell-uart-backlight: fix NULL pointer dereference in probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <af6ef60f-d47f-4840-8466-4605ad59716f@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 09:26:41 +0100
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y@...il.com>, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
 rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, acelan.kao@...onical.com,
 u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com
Cc: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 zijie98@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: dell-uart-backlight: fix NULL pointer
 dereference in probe

Hi,

On 11-Jan-25 7:01 PM, Chenyuan Yang wrote:
> The dell_uart_bl_serdev_probe() function calls devm_serdev_device_open()
> before setting the client ops via serdev_device_set_client_ops(). This
> ordering can trigger a NULL pointer dereference in the serdev controller's
> receive_buf handler, as it assumes serdev->ops is valid when
> SERPORT_ACTIVE is set.
> 
> This is similar to the issue fixed in commit 5e700b384ec1
> ("platform/chrome: cros_ec_uart: properly fix race condition") where
> devm_serdev_device_open() was called before fully initializing the
> device.
> 
> Fix the race by ensuring client ops are set before enabling the port via
> devm_serdev_device_open().
> Note, serdev_device_set_baudrate() and
> serdev_device_set_flow_control() calls should be
> after the devm_serdev_device_open() call.
> 
> Fixes: 484bae9e4d6a ("platform/x86: Add new Dell UART backlight driver")
> Signed-off-by: Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y@...il.com>
> CC: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>

Thanks, patch looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>

Regards,

Hans


> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-uart-backlight.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-uart-backlight.c b/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-uart-backlight.c
> index 6e5dc7e3674f..bcc5c0f3bb4d 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-uart-backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-uart-backlight.c
> @@ -283,6 +283,9 @@ static int dell_uart_bl_serdev_probe(struct serdev_device *serdev)
>  	init_waitqueue_head(&dell_bl->wait_queue);
>  	dell_bl->dev = dev;
>  
> +	serdev_device_set_drvdata(serdev, dell_bl);
> +	serdev_device_set_client_ops(serdev, &dell_uart_bl_serdev_ops);
> +
>  	ret = devm_serdev_device_open(dev, serdev);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "opening UART device\n");
> @@ -290,8 +293,6 @@ static int dell_uart_bl_serdev_probe(struct serdev_device *serdev)
>  	/* 9600 bps, no flow control, these are the default but set them to be sure */
>  	serdev_device_set_baudrate(serdev, 9600);
>  	serdev_device_set_flow_control(serdev, false);
> -	serdev_device_set_drvdata(serdev, dell_bl);
> -	serdev_device_set_client_ops(serdev, &dell_uart_bl_serdev_ops);
>  
>  	get_version[0] = DELL_SOF(GET_CMD_LEN);
>  	get_version[1] = CMD_GET_VERSION;