[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250113085529.GA499619@gnbcxd0016.gnb.st.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 09:55:52 +0100
From: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@...s.st.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@...s.st.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre
Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, Rob
Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor
Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] media: stm32: csi / dcmipp corrections
Hi Sakari,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 08:08:47AM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Alain,
>
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 02:16:03PM +0100, Alain Volmat wrote:
> > Various fixes within the stm32 csi bindings/drivers and
> > stm32 dcmipp driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@...s.st.com>
>
> Thanks for the update. I tried to apply this but it doesn't, and the
> culprit appears to be this line in dcmipp_graph_notify_bound():
>
> unsigned int ret;
>
> That appears to be a bug as such. The interesting thing is that the patch
> changing things around it presumes
>
> int ret;
>
> so it won't apply. Do you already have a patch that fixes it? It should be
> cc'd to stable, too, with a Fixes: tag.
Apologies for that, I might have made a mistake while rebase and somehow
a patch went before the b4 header commit. Pushing again a v3 with the
missing commit added.
Regards,
Alain
Powered by blists - more mailing lists