linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Fix ycbcr_420_allowed inconsistency for HDMI bridges

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250113-greedy-sawfly-of-temperance-1a87c7@houat>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 10:00:44 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>, 
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, kernel@...labora.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, 
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, 
	Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, 
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Fix ycbcr_420_allowed inconsistency for HDMI
 bridges

On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 01:36:59PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 02:55:52PM +0000, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 20:22:40 +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> > > Bridges with DRM_BRIDGE_OP_HDMI set in drm_bridge->ops are expected to
> > > rely on drm_bridge->supported_formats to advertise the supported
> > > colorspaces, including HDMI_COLORSPACE_YUV420.
> > > 
> > > However, when drm_bridge_connector gets initialised, only
> > > 
> > > [ ... ]
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> I thought about picking up those patches, but then I deciced to ask you
> first. I think first two patches should go to drm-next-fixes? Or just
> drm-fixes? While the last two patches look kike a drm-next material.

Everything can go in drm-misc-fixes imo.

Maxime

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (274 bytes)