[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nlrgtmnbkfupr5h7rawogrzw3lqi7hqmyq2d3u2wew7ojx7phn@6kw7vcz2yjny>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:13:59 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@...ux.dev>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>,
Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@...com>, Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@...com>,
Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>, DRI Development List <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/12] drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Move DSI mode check to
_atomic_check()
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 12:57:36AM +0530, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
> From: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@...com>
>
> At present, the DSI mode configuration check happens during the
> _atomic_enable() phase, which is not really the best place for this.
> Moreover, if the mode is not valid, the driver gives a warning and
> continues the hardware configuration.
>
> Move the DSI mode configuration check to _atomic_check() instead, which
> can properly report back any invalid mode, before the _enable phase even
> begins.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@...ux.dev>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++--
> .../gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.h
> index 5db5dbbbcaad..b785df45bc59 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.h
> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ struct cdns_dsi {
> bool link_initialized;
> bool phy_initialized;
> struct phy *dphy;
> + struct cdns_dsi_cfg dsi_cfg;
Is this still something necessary / useful? I think the point was to
move dsi_cfg to the state, while this is a non-state struct.
> };
>
> #endif /* !__CDNS_DSI_H__ */
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists