[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7b0e384b-6d42-48b7-ade0-f5a699bc369d@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:07:44 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Hao Ge <gehao@...inos.cn>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>, Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@....com.cn>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] mm/vmscan: Use PG_dropbehind instead of PG_reclaim
On 13.01.25 10:34, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> The recently introduced PG_dropbehind allows for freeing folios
> immediately after writeback. Unlike PG_reclaim, it does not need vmscan
> to be involved to get the folio freed.
>
> Instead of using folio_set_reclaim(), use folio_set_dropbehind() in
> pageout().
>
> It is safe to leave PG_dropbehind on the folio if, for some reason
> (bug?), the folio is not in a writeback state after ->writepage().
> In these cases, the kernel had to clear PG_reclaim as it shared a page
> flag bit with PG_readahead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 9 +++------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index a099876fa029..d15f80333d6b 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -692,19 +692,16 @@ static pageout_t pageout(struct folio *folio, struct address_space *mapping,
> if (shmem_mapping(mapping) && folio_test_large(folio))
> wbc.list = folio_list;
>
> - folio_set_reclaim(folio);
> + folio_set_dropbehind(folio);
> +
> res = mapping->a_ops->writepage(&folio->page, &wbc);
> if (res < 0)
> handle_write_error(mapping, folio, res);
> if (res == AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE) {
> - folio_clear_reclaim(folio);
> + folio_clear_dropbehind(folio);
> return PAGE_ACTIVATE;
> }
>
> - if (!folio_test_writeback(folio)) {
> - /* synchronous write or broken a_ops? */
> - folio_clear_reclaim(folio);
> - }
> trace_mm_vmscan_write_folio(folio);
> node_stat_add_folio(folio, NR_VMSCAN_WRITE);
> return PAGE_SUCCESS;
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists