linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] acpi/ghes: Make ghes_panic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250113125039.GEZ4UMH770bbNF9KFM@fat_crate.local>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 13:50:39 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com>, rafael@...nel.org,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi/ghes: Make ghes_panic_timeout adjustable as a
 parameter

On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 09:47:57PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> Also, is it worth including this patch into stable tree?

Only if this fixes a regression. Which this is not, AFAICT.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette