linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fadump: Use str_yes_no() helper in fadump_show

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47c96e26-4b2f-444d-98c8-9855013870c7@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 18:30:53 +0530
From: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>,
        Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V (IBM)" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fadump: Use str_yes_no() helper in fadump_show_config()




On 31/12/24 03:11, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> Remove hard-coded strings by using the str_yes_no() helper function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c | 6 ++----
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
> index 4b371c738213..8c531533dd3e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
> @@ -289,10 +289,8 @@ static void __init fadump_show_config(void)
>   	if (!fw_dump.fadump_supported)
>   		return;
>   
> -	pr_debug("Fadump enabled    : %s\n",
> -				(fw_dump.fadump_enabled ? "yes" : "no"));
> -	pr_debug("Dump Active       : %s\n",
> -				(fw_dump.dump_active ? "yes" : "no"));
> +	pr_debug("Fadump enabled    : %s\n", str_yes_no(fw_dump.fadump_enabled));
> +	pr_debug("Dump Active       : %s\n", str_yes_no(fw_dump.dump_active));
>   	pr_debug("Dump section sizes:\n");
>   	pr_debug("    CPU state data size: %lx\n", fw_dump.cpu_state_data_size);
>   	pr_debug("    HPTE region size   : %lx\n", fw_dump.hpte_region_size);

Yes, it is better to use `str_yes_no()` instead of hard-coded strings.

I have also tested your patch, and everything is working fine.

Reviewed-by: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@...ux.ibm.com>

Thanks,
Sourabh Jain