[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <81d36d57-7661-410b-b5e9-bd7af44686f0@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:58:01 +0200
From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/tests: hdmi: Add connector's CRTC deactivation
tests
Hi Maxime,
On 1/14/25 7:41 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 12:03:40AM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>> Following up a fixed bug in drm_atomic_helper_connector_hdmi_check(),
>> discovered while unloading a DRM module, add a couple of tests to make
>> sure the helper will not exhibit any abnormal behaviour for use cases
>> that involve shutting down the connector's CRTC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_hdmi_state_helper_test.c | 173 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 173 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_hdmi_state_helper_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_hdmi_state_helper_test.c
>> index c3b693bb966f1f8b04066d19f520bfa4bf11c23d..98187ecee5d77b5f758af29f4c4bfddbd1f658fd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_hdmi_state_helper_test.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_hdmi_state_helper_test.c
>> @@ -1568,6 +1568,177 @@ static void drm_test_check_output_bpc_format_display_8bpc_only(struct kunit *tes
>> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, conn_state->hdmi.output_format, HDMI_COLORSPACE_RGB);
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Test that if we deactivate connector's CRTC, we trigger a mode change
>> + * on that CRTC, along with setting {connectors|active}_changed.
>> + */
>> +static void drm_test_check_crtc_deactivate_mode_changed(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_atomic_helper_connector_hdmi_priv *priv;
>> + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx;
>> + struct drm_connector_state *old_conn_state;
>> + struct drm_connector_state *new_conn_state;
>> + struct drm_crtc_state *old_crtc_state;
>> + struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
>> + struct drm_atomic_state *state;
>> + struct drm_display_mode *preferred;
>> + struct drm_connector *conn;
>> + struct drm_device *drm;
>> + struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + priv = drm_kunit_helper_connector_hdmi_init(test,
>> + BIT(HDMI_COLORSPACE_RGB),
>> + 8);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, priv);
>> +
>> + conn = &priv->connector;
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, conn->display_info.is_hdmi);
>> +
>> + ctx = drm_kunit_helper_acquire_ctx_alloc(test);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx);
>> +
>> + preferred = find_preferred_mode(conn);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, preferred);
>> +
>> + drm = &priv->drm;
>> + crtc = priv->crtc;
>> + ret = light_up_connector(test, drm, crtc, conn, preferred, ctx);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>> +
>> + state = drm_kunit_helper_atomic_state_alloc(test, drm, ctx);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, state);
>> +
>> + new_conn_state = drm_atomic_get_connector_state(state, conn);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, new_conn_state);
>> +
>> + old_conn_state = drm_atomic_get_old_connector_state(state, conn);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, old_conn_state);
>> +
>> + new_crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_crtc_state(state, crtc);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, new_crtc_state);
>> +
>> + old_crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, crtc);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, old_crtc_state);
>> +
>> + ret = drm_atomic_set_mode_for_crtc(new_crtc_state, NULL);
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NE(test, old_crtc_state->enable, new_crtc_state->enable);
>> +
>> + new_crtc_state->active = false;
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NE(test, old_crtc_state->active, new_crtc_state->active);
>> +
>> + ret = drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_connector(new_conn_state, NULL);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>> +
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, old_conn_state->crtc, new_conn_state->crtc);
>> +
>> + ret = drm_atomic_check_only(state);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>> +
>> + new_crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, new_crtc_state);
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, new_crtc_state->mode_changed);
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, new_crtc_state->connectors_changed);
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, new_crtc_state->active_changed);
>> +}
>
> This one looks good to me
>
>> +/*
>> + * Test that if we deactivate connector's CRTC, while changing the max
>> + * bpc property to a different value, will not have any effect on the
>> + * output bpc property. However, we still trigger a mode change on that
>> + * CRTC, along with setting {connectors|active}_changed.
>> + */
>> +static void drm_test_check_crtc_deactivate_output_bpc_not_changed(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_atomic_helper_connector_hdmi_priv *priv;
>> + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx;
>> + struct drm_connector_state *old_conn_state;
>> + struct drm_connector_state *new_conn_state;
>> + struct drm_crtc_state *old_crtc_state;
>> + struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
>> + struct drm_atomic_state *state;
>> + struct drm_display_mode *preferred;
>> + struct drm_connector *conn;
>> + struct drm_device *drm;
>> + struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + priv = drm_kunit_helper_connector_hdmi_init(test,
>> + BIT(HDMI_COLORSPACE_RGB),
>> + 10);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, priv);
>> +
>> + conn = &priv->connector;
>> + ret = set_connector_edid(test, conn,
>> + test_edid_hdmi_1080p_rgb_yuv_dc_max_200mhz,
>> + ARRAY_SIZE(test_edid_hdmi_1080p_rgb_yuv_dc_max_200mhz));
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, ret, 0);
>> +
>> + ctx = drm_kunit_helper_acquire_ctx_alloc(test);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx);
>> +
>> + preferred = find_preferred_mode(conn);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, preferred);
>> +
>> + drm = &priv->drm;
>> + crtc = priv->crtc;
>> + ret = light_up_connector(test, drm, crtc, conn, preferred, ctx);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>> +
>> + state = drm_kunit_helper_atomic_state_alloc(test, drm, ctx);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, state);
>> +
>> + new_conn_state = drm_atomic_get_connector_state(state, conn);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, new_conn_state);
>> +
>> + old_conn_state = drm_atomic_get_old_connector_state(state, conn);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, old_conn_state);
>> +
>> + new_conn_state->max_requested_bpc = 8;
>> +
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NE(test,
>> + old_conn_state->max_requested_bpc,
>> + new_conn_state->max_requested_bpc);
>> +
>> + new_crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_crtc_state(state, crtc);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, new_crtc_state);
>> +
>> + old_crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, crtc);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, old_crtc_state);
>> +
>> + ret = drm_atomic_set_mode_for_crtc(new_crtc_state, NULL);
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NE(test, old_crtc_state->enable, new_crtc_state->enable);
>> +
>> + new_crtc_state->active = false;
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NE(test, old_crtc_state->active, new_crtc_state->active);
>> +
>> + ret = drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_connector(new_conn_state, NULL);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>> +
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, old_conn_state->crtc, new_conn_state->crtc);
>> +
>> + ret = drm_atomic_check_only(state);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>> +
>> + old_conn_state = drm_atomic_get_old_connector_state(state, conn);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, old_conn_state);
>> +
>> + new_conn_state = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state(state, conn);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, new_conn_state);
>> +
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
>> + old_conn_state->hdmi.output_bpc,
>> + new_conn_state->hdmi.output_bpc);
>> +
>> + new_crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, new_crtc_state);
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, new_crtc_state->mode_changed);
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, new_crtc_state->connectors_changed);
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, new_crtc_state->active_changed);
>> +}
>> +
>
> However, it's not clear to me why changing bpc should change anything,
> or why it's worth testing?
I suppose I may have gone a little too far with all this testing :-)
Will drop and send v3.
Thanks for reviewing,
Cristian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists