[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f263350-a455-45a8-86d3-314b5d7a7e26@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:23:49 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Michael Ellerman
<mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>, Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use str_enable_disable-like helpers
On 14/01/2025 11:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> if (cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(enable)) {
> pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST!\n",
> - __func__, enable ? "enable" : "disable");
> + __func__, str_enable_disable(enable));
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> pr_debug("%s: cpufreq BOOST %s\n",
> - __func__, enable ? "enabled" : "disabled");
> + __func__, str_enable_disable(enable));
This needs fix - enabled, not enable. V2.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists