lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c35845be-46dc-4868-b8f7-beb44eee04cc@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 11:40:04 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: chrisl@...nel.org, david@...hat.com, ioworker0@...il.com,
 kasong@...cent.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ryan.roberts@....com, v-songbaohua@...o.com,
 x86@...nel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, ying.huang@...el.com,
 zhengtangquan@...o.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: Avoid splitting pmd for lazyfree pmd-mapped
 THP in try_to_unmap



On 2025/1/13 11:39, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
> 
> The try_to_unmap_one() function currently handles PMD-mapped THPs
> inefficiently. It first splits the PMD into PTEs, copies the dirty
> state from the PMD to the PTEs, iterates over the PTEs to locate
> the dirty state, and then marks the THP as swap-backed. This process
> involves unnecessary PMD splitting and redundant iteration. Instead,
> this functionality can be efficiently managed in
> __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(), avoiding the extra steps and
> improving performance.
> 
> The following microbenchmark redirties folios after invoking MADV_FREE,
> then measures the time taken to perform memory reclamation (actually
> set those folios swapbacked again) on the redirtied folios.
> 
>   #include <stdio.h>
>   #include <sys/mman.h>
>   #include <string.h>
>   #include <time.h>
> 
>   #define SIZE 128*1024*1024  // 128 MB
> 
>   int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>   {
>   	while(1) {
>   		volatile int *p = mmap(0, SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
>   				MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> 
>   		memset((void *)p, 1, SIZE);
>   		madvise((void *)p, SIZE, MADV_FREE);
>   		/* redirty after MADV_FREE */
>   		memset((void *)p, 1, SIZE);
> 
> 		clock_t start_time = clock();
>   		madvise((void *)p, SIZE, MADV_PAGEOUT);
>   		clock_t end_time = clock();
> 
>   		double elapsed_time = (double)(end_time - start_time) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC;
>   		printf("Time taken by reclamation: %f seconds\n", elapsed_time);
> 
>   		munmap((void *)p, SIZE);
>   	}
>   	return 0;
>   }
> 
> Testing results are as below,
> w/o patch:
> ~ # ./a.out
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007300 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007226 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007295 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007731 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007134 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007285 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007720 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007128 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007710 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007712 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007236 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007690 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007174 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007670 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007169 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007305 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007432 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007158 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007133 seconds
> …
> 
> w/ patch
> 
> ~ # ./a.out
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002124 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002116 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002150 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002261 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002137 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002173 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002063 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002088 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002169 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002124 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002111 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002224 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002297 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002260 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002246 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002272 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002277 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002462 seconds
> …
> 
> This patch significantly speeds up try_to_unmap_one() by allowing it
> to skip redirtied THPs without splitting the PMD.
> 
> Suggested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Suggested-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
> ---
>   mm/huge_memory.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>   mm/rmap.c        | 11 ++++++++++-
>   2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 3d3ebdc002d5..aea49f7125f1 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -3070,8 +3070,12 @@ static bool __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   	int ref_count, map_count;
>   	pmd_t orig_pmd = *pmdp;
>   
> -	if (folio_test_dirty(folio) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd))
> +	if (pmd_dirty(orig_pmd))
> +		folio_set_dirty(folio);
> +	if (folio_test_dirty(folio) && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_DROPPABLE)) {
> +		folio_set_swapbacked(folio);
>   		return false;
> +	}
>   
>   	orig_pmd = pmdp_huge_clear_flush(vma, addr, pmdp);
>   
> @@ -3098,8 +3102,15 @@ static bool __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   	 *
>   	 * The only folio refs must be one from isolation plus the rmap(s).
>   	 */
> -	if (folio_test_dirty(folio) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd) ||
> -	    ref_count != map_count + 1) {
> +	if (pmd_dirty(orig_pmd))
> +		folio_set_dirty(folio);
> +	if (folio_test_dirty(folio) && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_DROPPABLE)) {
> +		folio_set_swapbacked(folio);
> +		set_pmd_at(mm, addr, pmdp, orig_pmd);
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ref_count != map_count + 1) {
>   		set_pmd_at(mm, addr, pmdp, orig_pmd);
>   		return false;
>   	}
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index 3ef659310797..02c4e4b2cd7b 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -1671,7 +1671,7 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   	DEFINE_FOLIO_VMA_WALK(pvmw, folio, vma, address, 0);
>   	pte_t pteval;
>   	struct page *subpage;
> -	bool anon_exclusive, ret = true;
> +	bool anon_exclusive, lazyfree, ret = true;
>   	struct mmu_notifier_range range;
>   	enum ttu_flags flags = (enum ttu_flags)(long)arg;
>   	int nr_pages = 1;
> @@ -1724,9 +1724,18 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   		}
>   
>   		if (!pvmw.pte) {
> +			lazyfree = folio_test_anon(folio) && !folio_test_swapbacked(folio);

You've checked lazyfree here, so can we remove the duplicate check in 
unmap_huge_pmd_locked()? Then the code should be:

		if (lazyfree && unmap_huge_pmd_locked(...))
			goto walk_done;

>   			if (unmap_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address, pvmw.pmd,
>   						  folio))
>   				goto walk_done;
> +			/*
> +			 * unmap_huge_pmd_locked has either already marked
> +			 * the folio as swap-backed or decided to retain it
> +			 * due to GUP or speculative references.
> +			 */
> +			if (lazyfree)
> +				goto walk_abort;
>   
>   			if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD) {
>   				/*

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ