[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6786e3298262a_186d9b29433@iweiny-mobl.notmuch>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 16:20:25 -0600
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<nifan.cxl@...il.com>, <dave@...olabs.net>, <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
<dave.jiang@...el.com>, <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
<vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <mahesh@...ux.ibm.com>, <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
<oohall@...il.com>, <Benjamin.Cheatham@....com>, <rrichter@....com>,
<nathan.fontenot@....com>, <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
<lukas@...ner.de>, <ming.li@...omail.com>,
<PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@....com>, <alucerop@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/16] cxl/pci: Update RAS handler interfaces to also
support CXL PCIe Ports
Terry Bowman wrote:
> CXL PCIe Port Protocol Error handling support will be added to the
> CXL drivers in the future. In preparation, rename the existing
> interfaces to support handling all CXL PCIe Port Protocol Errors.
>
> The driver's RAS support functions currently rely on a 'struct
> cxl_dev_state' type parameter, which is not available for CXL Port
> devices. However, since the same CXL RAS capability structure is
> needed across most CXL components and devices, a common handling
> approach should be adopted.
>
> To accommodate this, update the __cxl_handle_cor_ras() and
> __cxl_handle_ras() functions to use a `struct device` instead of
> `struct cxl_dev_state`.
>
> No functional changes are introduced.
>
> [1] CXL 3.1 Spec, 8.2.4 CXL.cache and CXL.mem Registers
>
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
[snip]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists