linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] iomap: Lift blocksize restriction on atomic writes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z4XranZM2tCFbqZc@dread.disaster.area>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 15:43:22 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Cc: brauner@...nel.org, djwong@...nel.org, cem@...nel.org,
	dchinner@...hat.com, hch@....de, ritesh.list@...il.com,
	linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] iomap: Lift blocksize restriction on atomic writes

On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 09:35:01PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> Dave,
> 
> I provided an proposal to solve this issue in
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241210125737.786928-3-john.g.garry@oracle.com/
> (there is also a v3, which is much the same.
> 
> but I can't make progress, as there is no agreement upon how this should be
> implemented, if at all. Any input there would be appreciated...

I've been on PTO since mid december. I'm trying to catch up now.

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com