[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250114074432.458988-1-wenliang202407@163.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 15:44:32 +0800
From: Wenliang Yan <wenliang202407@....com>
To: linux@...ck-us.net
Cc: conor+dt@...nel.org,
corbet@....net,
jdelvare@...e.com,
krzk+dt@...nel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
robh@...nel.org,
wenliang202407@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] hwmon:(ina238)Add support for SQ52206
At 2025-01-14 01:45:48, "Guenter Roeck" <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:50:23AM +0800, Wenliang Yan wrote:
>> Add support for SQ52206 to the Ina238 driver. Add registers,
>> add calculation formulas, increase compatibility, add
>> compatibility programs for multiple chips.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wenliang Yan <wenliang202407@....com>
>> ---
>...
>> @@ -452,6 +554,9 @@ static umode_t ina238_is_visible(const void *drvdata,
>> enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
>> u32 attr, int channel)
>> {
>> + const struct ina238_data *data = drvdata;
>> + bool has_power_highest = data->config->has_power_highest;
>> +
>> switch (type) {
>> case hwmon_in:
>> switch (attr) {
>> @@ -479,6 +584,10 @@ static umode_t ina238_is_visible(const void *drvdata,
>> return 0444;
>> case hwmon_power_max:
>> return 0644;
>> + case hwmon_power_input_highest:
>> + if (has_power_highest)
>> + return 0444;
>> + break;
>
>This doesn't work as intended. The break; results in the code
>entering the hwmon_temp: case. It has to be "return 0;" or
>the entire function needs to be rewritten to use "break;"
>to exit the switch statements, and "return 0;" at the end
>of the function.
>
Yes, I made a mistake with the nested hierarchy. I will change
'break' to 'return 0'
>> static int ina238_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>> {
>...
>> - if (data->gain == 1)
>> + config = data->config->config_default;
>> + if (chip == sq52206)
>> + if (data->gain == 1)
>> + config |= SQ52206_CONFIG_ADCRANGE_HIGH; /* ADCRANGE = 10/11 is /1 */
>> + else if (data->gain == 2)
>> + config |= SQ52206_CONFIG_ADCRANGE_LOW; /* ADCRANGE = 01 is /2 */
>> + else if (data->gain == 1)
>
>The "else" here is the else from "if (data->gain == 2)" which is wrong.
>The entire if/else block from "if (chip == sq52206)" needs to be in {}
>to avoid that.
>
Agree.
>> config |= INA238_CONFIG_ADCRANGE; /* ADCRANGE = 1 is /1 */
>> ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, INA238_CONFIG, config);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> @@ -605,7 +735,8 @@ static int ina238_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>>
>> hwmon_dev = devm_hwmon_device_register_with_info(dev, client->name, data,
>> &ina238_chip_info,
>> - NULL);
>> + data->config->has_energy ?
>> + NULL : ina238_groups);
>
>This seems to be wrong check. I would assume that ina238_groups is passed
>if data->config->has_energy is true, not if it is false.
>
Yes, the logic here is reversed. Should exchange NULL and ina238_groups.
>Guenter
Thanks,
Wenliang Yan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists