| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20250114094832.350073-1-mrpre@163.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 17:48:32 +0800 From: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@....com> To: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, corbet@....net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@....com> Subject: [PATCH v1] docs/arch: remove deprecated function name The dumpstack.c file has undergone many modifications, and the print_context_stack() function was removed or rewritten a long time ago, so it's better to remove the incorrect guidance. Additionally, no new functions will be added to the documentation, as it may be modified again in the future. Using 'question mark' and 'dumpstack' is sufficient to index this document. Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@....com> --- Documentation/arch/x86/kernel-stacks.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/kernel-stacks.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/kernel-stacks.rst index 738671a4070b..2d355e78008e 100644 --- a/Documentation/arch/x86/kernel-stacks.rst +++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/kernel-stacks.rst @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ Printing backtraces on x86 The question about the '?' preceding function names in an x86 stacktrace keeps popping up, here's an indepth explanation. It helps if the reader -stares at print_context_stack() and the whole machinery in and around +stares at 'question mark' and the whole machinery in and around arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c. Adapted from Ingo's mail, Message-ID: <20150521101614.GA10889@...il.com>: -- 2.43.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists