[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z4Y3OE8ubIWGiDhb@pluto>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 10:07:03 +0000
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org" <arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] firmware: arm_scmi: bus: Bypass setting fwnode for
pinctrl
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 08:31:03AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Cristian, Sudeep
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] firmware: arm_scmi: bus: Bypass setting
> > fwnode for pinctrl
> >
> [...]
>
> > >> fix here) than this change.
> > >
> > >...or indeed this is another possibility
> >
> > I am doing a patch as below, how to do you think?
>
> Do you have any comments on below ideas?
>
> I am thinking to send out new patchset based on
> below ideas in this week.
>
Hi Peng,
sorry for the delay.
Why both blacklist and allowlist ?
Cristian
> >
> > With below patch, we could resolve the devlink issue and also support
> > mutitple vendor drivers built in, with each vendor driver has a
> > machine_allowlist.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> > b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c index
> > 1d2aedfcfdb4..c1c45b545480 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> > @@ -55,6 +55,20 @@ static int scmi_protocol_device_request(const
> > struct scmi_device_id *id_table)
> > unsigned int id = 0;
> > struct list_head *head, *phead = NULL;
> > struct scmi_requested_dev *rdev;
> > + const char * const *allowlist = id_table->machine_allowlist;
> > + const char * const *blocklist = id_table->machine_blocklist;
> > +
> > + if (blocklist && of_machine_compatible_match(blocklist)) {
> > + pr_debug("block SCMI device (%s) for protocol %x\n",
> > + id_table->name, id_table->protocol_id);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (allowlist && !of_machine_compatible_match(allowlist)) {
> > + pr_debug("block SCMI device (%s) for protocol %x\n",
> > + id_table->name, id_table->protocol_id);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> >
> > pr_debug("Requesting SCMI device (%s) for protocol %x\n",
> > id_table->name, id_table->protocol_id); diff --git
> > a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h index
> > 688466a0e816..e1b822d3522f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
> > @@ -950,6 +950,9 @@ struct scmi_device { struct scmi_device_id {
> > u8 protocol_id;
> > const char *name;
> > + /* Optional */
> > + const char * const *machine_blocklist;
> > + const char * const *machine_allowlist;
> > };
>
> Thanks,
> Peng.
>
> >
> > struct scmi_driver {
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Peng
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >Cristian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists