[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaNjok9GAAXtjEtS6r5X+k75SVmtCavKo_ECQWPHqmBPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 13:35:02 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
Cc: Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>,
jonas.gorski@...il.com, kylehendrydev@...il.com,
florian.fainelli@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: regmap: Use generic request/free ops
On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 9:17 PM Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net> wrote:
> Set the gpiochip request and free ops to the generic implementations.
> This way a user can provide a gpio-ranges property defined for a pinmux,
> easing muxing of gpio functions. Provided that the pin controller
> implementents the pinmux op .gpio_request_enable(), pins will
> automatically be muxed to their GPIO function when requested.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
> ---
> Álvaro has submitted a similar patch today. My implementation's impact
> is more limited, but I hadn't gotten around to submitting it yet.
This is fine, I'll check Álvaros two patches, if his patch is equivalent
I can apply just the pinctrl patch.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists