lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250114130720.GJ26854@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 09:07:20 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@....fi>,
	James Bottomley <james.bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/sev: add a SVSM vTPM platform device

On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 11:42:34AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> Hi Jarkko,
> 
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 at 17:07, Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 05:40:58PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > >On Thu Dec 19, 2024 at 5:35 PM EET, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > >> So to use them directly in sev, we would have to move these definitions
> > >> into include/linux/tpm.h or some other file in inlcude/. Is this
> > >> acceptable for TPM maintainers?
> > >
> > >There's only me.
> > >
> > >I don't know.
> > >
> > >What you want to put to include/linux/tpm.h anyway?
> >
> > At least tpmm_chip_alloc(), tpm2_probe(), and tpm_chip_register()

The intention was that tpm drivers would be under drivers/char/tpm/

Do you really need to put your tpm driver in arch code? Historically
drivers in arch code have not worked out so well.

Meaning that you'd export some of your arch stuff for the tpm driver
to live in its natural home

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ