[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a6a9dfce-6cac-4831-9c96-45471f5ee13a@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 13:26:47 +0000
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>, pratyush@...nel.org,
mwalle@...nel.org, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at,
vigneshr@...com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: alvinzhou@...c.com.tw, leoyu@...c.com.tw,
Cheng Ming Lin <chengminglin@...c.com.tw>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Cheng Ming Lin <linchengming884@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mtd: spi-nor: core: replace dummy buswidth from
addr to data
On 1/14/25 12:57 PM, Alexander Stein wrote:
> Hello everyone,
Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, 12. November 2024, 08:52:42 CET schrieb Cheng Ming Lin:
>> From: Cheng Ming Lin <chengminglin@...c.com.tw>
>>
>> The default dummy cycle for Macronix SPI NOR flash in Octal Output
>> Read Mode(1-1-8) is 20.
>>
>> Currently, the dummy buswidth is set according to the address bus width.
>> In the 1-1-8 mode, this means the dummy buswidth is 1. When converting
>> dummy cycles to bytes, this results in 20 x 1 / 8 = 2 bytes, causing the
>> host to read data 4 cycles too early.
>>
>> Since the protocol data buswidth is always greater than or equal to the
>> address buswidth. Setting the dummy buswidth to match the data buswidth
>> increases the likelihood that the dummy cycle-to-byte conversion will be
>> divisible, preventing the host from reading data prematurely.
>>
>> Fixes: 0e30f47232ab5 ("mtd: spi-nor: add support for DTR protocol")
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>> Reviewd-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Cheng Ming Lin <chengminglin@...c.com.tw>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
>> index f9c189ed7353..c7aceaa8a43f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
>> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ void spi_nor_spimem_setup_op(const struct spi_nor *nor,
>> op->addr.buswidth = spi_nor_get_protocol_addr_nbits(proto);
>>
>> if (op->dummy.nbytes)
>> - op->dummy.buswidth = spi_nor_get_protocol_addr_nbits(proto);
>> + op->dummy.buswidth = spi_nor_get_protocol_data_nbits(proto);
>>
>> if (op->data.nbytes)
>> op->data.buswidth = spi_nor_get_protocol_data_nbits(proto);
>>
>
> I just noticed this commit caused a regression on my i.MX8M Plus based board,
> detected using git bisect.
> DT: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-tqma8mpql-mba8mpxl.dts
> Starting with this patch read is only 1S-1S-1S, before it was
> 1S-1S-4S.
>
> before:
>> cat /sys/kernel/debug/spi-nor/spi0.0/params
>> name mt25qu512a
>> id 20 bb 20 10 44 00
>> size 64.0 MiB
>> write size 1
>> page size 256
>> address nbytes 4
>> flags HAS_SR_TB | 4B_OPCODES | HAS_4BAIT | HAS_LOCK | HAS_4BIT_BP
>> | HAS_SR_BP3_BIT6 | SOFT_RESET
>>
>> opcodes
>>
>> read 0x6c
>>
>> dummy cycles 8
>>
>> erase 0xdc
>> program 0x12
>> 8D extension none
>>
>> protocols
>>
>> read 1S-1S-4S
>> write 1S-1S-1S
>> register 1S-1S-1S
>>
>> erase commands
>>
>> 21 (4.00 KiB) [1]
>> dc (64.0 KiB) [3]
>> c7 (64.0 MiB)
>>
>> sector map
>>
>> region (in hex) | erase mask | overlaid
>> ------------------+------------+----------
>> 00000000-03ffffff | [ 3] | no
>
> after:
>> cat /sys/kernel/debug/spi-nor/spi0.0/params
>> name mt25qu512a
>> id 20 bb 20 10 44 00
>> size 64.0 MiB
>> write size 1
>> page size 256
>> address nbytes 4
>> flags HAS_SR_TB | 4B_OPCODES | HAS_4BAIT | HAS_LOCK | HAS_4BIT_BP
>> | HAS_SR_BP3_BIT6 | SOFT_RESET
>>
>> opcodes
>>
>> read 0x13
>>
>> dummy cycles 0
>>
>> erase 0xdc
>> program 0x12
>> 8D extension none
>>
>> protocols
>>
>> read 1S-1S-1S
>> write 1S-1S-1S
>> register 1S-1S-1S
>>
>> erase commands
>>
>> 21 (4.00 KiB) [1]
>> dc (64.0 KiB) [3]
>> c7 (64.0 MiB)
>>
>> sector map
>>
>> region (in hex) | erase mask | overlaid
>> ------------------+------------+----------
>> 00000000-03ffffff | [ 3] | no
>
> AFAICT the patch seems sane, so it probably just uncovered another
> problem already lurking somewhere deeper.
> Given the HW similarity I expect imx8mn and imx8mm based platforms to be
> affected as well.
> Reverting this commit make the read to be 1S-1S-4S again.
> Any ideas ow to tackling down this problem?
>
My guess is that 1S-1S-4S is stripped out in
spi_nor_spimem_adjust_hwcaps(). Maybe the controller has some limitation
in nxp_fspi_supports_op(). Would you add some prints, and check these
chunks of code?
Cheers,
ta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists