[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9f527c0-4530-42ad-8cc9-cb04aa3d94b7@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 13:52:57 +0000
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Michal Koutny <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>, Aashish Sharma <shraash@...gle.com>,
Shin Kawamura <kawasin@...gle.com>,
Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineeth@...byteword.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/2] sched/deadline: Check bandwidth overflow earlier
for hotplug
On 13/01/2025 09:32, Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 10/01/25 18:40, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> With the above I see the following ...
>>
>> [ 53.919672] dl_bw_manage: cpu=5 cap=3072 fair_server_bw=52428 total_bw=209712 dl_bw_cpus=4
>> [ 53.930608] dl_bw_manage: cpu=4 cap=2048 fair_server_bw=52428 total_bw=157284 dl_bw_cpus=3
>> [ 53.941601] dl_bw_manage: cpu=3 cap=1024 fair_server_bw=52428 total_bw=104856 dl_bw_cpus=2
>
> So far so good.
>
>> [ 53.952186] dl_bw_manage: cpu=2 cap=1024 fair_server_bw=52428 total_bw=576708 dl_bw_cpus=2
>
> But, this above doesn't sound right.
>
>> [ 53.962938] dl_bw_manage: cpu=1 cap=0 fair_server_bw=52428 total_bw=576708 dl_bw_cpus=1
>> [ 53.971068] Error taking CPU1 down: -16
>> [ 53.974912] Non-boot CPUs are not disabled
>
> What is the topology of your board?
>
> Are you using any cpuset configuration for partitioning CPUs?
I just noticed that by default we do boot this board with
'isolcpus=1-2'. I see that this is a deprecated cmdline argument now and
I must admit I don't know the history of this for this specific board.
It is quite old now.
Thierry, I am curious if you have this set for Tegra186 or not? Looks
like our BSP (r35 based) sets this by default.
I did try removing this and that does appear to fix it.
Juri, let me know your thoughts.
Thanks!
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists