[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <291b5c9a-af51-4b7a-91de-8408a33f8390@efficios.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 09:07:19 -0500
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/rseq: Fix rseq for cases without glibc support
On 2025-01-13 18:06, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 12/10/24 15:44, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:
>> Currently the rseq constructor, rseq_init(), assumes that glibc always
>> has the support for rseq symbols (__rseq_size for instance). However,
>> glibc supports rseq from version 2.35 onwards. As a result, for the
>> systems that run glibc less than 2.35, the global rseq_size remains
>> initialized to -1U. When a thread then tries to register for rseq,
>> get_rseq_min_alloc_size() would end up returning -1U, which is
>> incorrect. Hence, initialize rseq_size for the cases where glibc doesn't
>> have the support for rseq symbols.
>>
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>> Fixes: 73a4f5a704a2 ("selftests/rseq: Fix mm_cid test failure")
>> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
>> ---
>
> Applied to linux_kselftest next for Linux 6.14-rc1 after fixing the
> commit if for Fixes tag
Hi Shuah,
I did not review nor ack this patch. I need to review it carefully
to make sure it does not break anything else moving forward.
Please wait before merging.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists