[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z4fDfQcnZiHC0Fms@kekkonen.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 14:17:33 +0000
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>,
Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/19] media: i2c: ds90ub953: Speed-up I2C watchdog timer
Moi,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 11:14:07AM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> From: Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@...asonboard.com>
>
> On the I2C bus for remote clients (sensors), by default the watchdog
> timer expires in 1s. To allow for a quicker system bring-up time, TI
> recommends to speed it up to 50us [1].
>
> [1]: Section 7.3.1.1 - https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/ds90ub953-q1
>
> Signed-off-by: Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@...asonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub953.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub953.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub953.c
> index 99a4852b9381..6c36980e8beb 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub953.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub953.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,10 @@
> #define UB953_REG_CLKOUT_CTRL0 0x06
> #define UB953_REG_CLKOUT_CTRL1 0x07
>
> +#define UB953_REG_I2C_CONTROL2 0x0a
> +#define UB953_REG_I2C_CONTROL2_SDA_OUTPUT_SETUP_SHIFT 4
> +#define UB953_REG_I2C_CONTROL2_BUS_SPEEDUP BIT(1)
> +
> #define UB953_REG_SCL_HIGH_TIME 0x0b
> #define UB953_REG_SCL_LOW_TIME 0x0c
>
> @@ -1320,6 +1324,13 @@ static int ub953_hw_init(struct ub953_data *priv)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + v = 0;
> + v |= 1 << UB953_REG_I2C_CONTROL2_SDA_OUTPUT_SETUP_SHIFT;
BIT()? Or at least 1U <<< ...;.
> + v |= UB953_REG_I2C_CONTROL2_BUS_SPEEDUP;
> + ret = ub953_write(priv, UB953_REG_I2C_CONTROL2, v, NULL);
I'd just do this without a temporary variable. If you prefer to keep it, do
assign the first calculated value there first and remove the assignment to
zero.
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
No need for this.
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
>
--
Terveisin,
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists