[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250115100547.63dec2d7@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 10:05:47 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, helgaas@...nel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, tony.luck@...el.com, bp@...en8.de,
mhiramat@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, oleg@...hat.com,
naveen@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com,
mark.rutland@....com, peterz@...radead.org, tianruidong@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] PCI: hotplug: Add a generic RAS tracepoint for
hotplug event
On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 10:33:39 +0100
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > > __string( port_name, pci_name(ctrl->pcie->port) )
> > > __string( slot, slot_name(ctrl) )
> > > __field( int, event )
> > >
> > > and everything else could be the same.
> >
> > Maybe it's not a good idea.
> >
> > I think pci_hp_event is a generic event for pciehp, shpchp, octep_hp, etc.
> > But each hotplug driver has different `struct controller` and slot_name().
> [...]
> > So, IMHO, pass port_name and slot_name from each driver is more simple.
> >
> > + @Lukas for hotplug part.
>
> You're right Shuai, there's several hotplug drivers in drivers/pci/hotplug/
> and pciehp is just one of them. It's quite possible that other drivers
> besides pciehp will want to add trace points as well. For consistency,
> the trace event definitions need to work for all drivers.
OK, if this is a generic trace event then it does make sense sending in the
names instead of the structure.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists