linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] docs: checkpatch: Document checkpatch-ignore feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+i-1C38tYSjegs2jd5gXcuUk0ipEU3rPpS3KzA0eSF=RrGumQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 16:39:51 +0100
From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, 
	Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>, Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>, 
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, workflows@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] docs: checkpatch: Document checkpatch-ignore feature

On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 at 16:33, Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com> wrote:
> +1. Configure git to include the `checkpatch-ignore` notes ref in formatted

Argh, make htmldocs just finished (it takes an extremely long time for
me...) and I realised I sent this without checking the docs output.
Turns out backticks aren't the right syntax for .rst.

Will wait for feedback on the actual thing before fixing this.