[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfZncRy_Qx_Yi_QjqX2cszv9X9st5Yk87Q7R3Hug2S9KQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 17:55:51 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>, Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
Catalin Popescu <catalin.popescu@...ca-geosystems.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] gpio: mxc: remove dead code after switch to DT-only
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:19 PM Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
> struct platform_device::id was only set by board code, but since i.MX
> became a devicetree-only platform, this will always be -1
> (PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE).
>
> Note: of_alias_get_id() returns a negative number on error and base
> treats all negative errors the same, so we need not add any additional
> error handling.
>
> Fixes: 0f2c7af45d7e ("gpio: mxc: Convert the driver to DT-only")
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
> index 4cb455b2bdee71ba4eb20c93567c3b8db100dbb2..619b6fb9d833a4bb94a93b4209f01b49ad1cbdb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
> @@ -490,8 +490,7 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> port->gc.request = mxc_gpio_request;
> port->gc.free = mxc_gpio_free;
> port->gc.to_irq = mxc_gpio_to_irq;
> - port->gc.base = (pdev->id < 0) ? of_alias_get_id(np, "gpio") * 32 :
> - pdev->id * 32;
> + port->gc.base = of_alias_get_id(np, "gpio") * 32;
>
> err = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &port->gc, port);
> if (err)
>
> --
> 2.39.5
>
This looks like I can pick it up separately from the rest? Is that right?
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists