[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871px3lw5q.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 20:22:25 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: "Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra
<vigneshr@...com>, "De Marchi, Lucas" <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>, Thomas
Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>, "Vivi,
Rodrigo"
<rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, Maarten Lankhorst
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie
<airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Jani Nikula
<jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Joonas Lahtinen
<joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
"Poosa, Karthik" <karthik.poosa@...el.com>, "Abliyev, Reuven"
<reuven.abliyev@...el.com>, "Weil, Oren jer" <oren.jer.weil@...el.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] mtd: core: always create master device
Hi,
On 14/01/2025 at 14:05:40 GMT, "Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com> wrote:
>> > > Create master device without partition when
>> > > CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER flag is unset.
>> >
>> > I don't think you took into consideration my remarks regarding the fact
>> > that you would break userspace. If you enable the master, you no longer
>> > have the same device numbering in userspace. I know people should not
>> > care about these numbers, but in practice they do.
>> >
>> > If I'm wrong, please be a little more verbose about why :)
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Miquèl
>>
>> Hi Miquel
>>
>> I've created separate class (mtd_master) for such devices.
>> Uses-space looking for mtd device continues to receive same number of
>> /dev/mtdX devices.
>> There will be additional /dev/mtd_masterX devices, but this is unavoidable, I
>> suppose.
>> Maybe we can rename it to something that not in /dev/mtd* expression (e.g.
>> mastermtdX),
>> if it helps.
>>
>
> Miquel, is this good enough or requires rewrite?
This is an important change that requires attention, and at the time I
have not been able to dedicate enough to this patch.
Also, if the other mtd maintainers want to help, I'll be enthousiastic
about it :)
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists