[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42b0bf4c-d39b-4a97-a746-0a1f4c1748a8@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 22:51:45 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>,
Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@...labora.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>,
Jianhua Lu <lujianhua000@...il.com>,
Stefan Schmidt <stefan.schmidt@...aro.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 27/28] media: iris: enable video driver probe of SM8250
SoC
On 15/01/2025 22:49, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> Shouldn't there be a parallel venus patch which either has its own
> module parameter to quiesce binding in favour of iris ?
I almost typed "either has its own variable _or_ reads the iris
variable" but then didn't.
Shouldn't venus have its own quiescence variable caveated to the
transition list too ?
Caveated to sm8250.
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists