linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: Add support for MT8196

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5fc60d39bfb6f0c87d26381afd2d777b075a8b70.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 01:25:07 +0000
From: Cathy Xu (许华婷) <ot_cathy.xu@...iatek.com>
To: "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, "sean.wang@...nel.org"
	<sean.wang@...nel.org>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, "krzk@...nel.org"
	<krzk@...nel.org>, "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Guodong Liu (刘国栋) <Guodong.Liu@...iatek.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: Add support for MT8196

On Tue, 2025-01-14 at 12:25 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> 
> On 14/01/2025 08:47, Cathy Xu (许华婷) wrote:
> > > 
> > > Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Then
> > > please
> > > run `scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict` and (probably) fix more
> > > warnings.
> > > Some warnings can be ignored, especially from --strict run, but
> > > the
> > > code
> > > here looks like it needs a fix. Feel free to get in touch if the
> > > warning
> > > is not clear.
> > 
> >   Sorry, it's the same here, no warnings were reported here. Could
> > you
> > please point it out? Thank you~
> 
> 
> Maybe there is no warning... So I meant that bindings are always
> separate. The binding header always belongs to the binding doc.
  Understood, it will be fixed in next version, thank you.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof