[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z4el2qEV1xZIMBfk@bergen>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:11:06 +0100
From: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: Add kconfig utility scripts
On Wed 08 Jan 2025 13:34:28 GMT, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> There are various utilities in scripts/ which work with kconfig
> files.
> These have currently no maintainer.
> As most patches for them are applied through kconfig/kbuild anyways,
> add an explicit maintainership entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 30cbc3d44cd53e6b1a81d56161004d7ab825d7a9..2bd414fb3e6d6515b57a57a5f3d4d735137edcce 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -12385,6 +12385,9 @@ Q: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-kbuild/list/
> T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild.git kbuild
> F: Documentation/kbuild/kconfig*
> F: scripts/Kconfig.include
> +F: scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py
> +F: scripts/config
> +F: scripts/diffconfig
Thanks!
Does it make sense to add scripts/extract-ikconfig also? It does not
handle kconfig language at all, but linux-kbuild would probably still a
good place for review.
Nevertheless,
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>
Kind regards,
Nicolas
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists