[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab28f8d9-266a-48ca-80cb-21ac66a97e61@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 10:07:35 -0600
From: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mailbox: zynqmp: Remove invalid __percpu annotation in
zynqmp_ipi_probe()
On 1/16/25 2:52 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 6:47 PM Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com> wrote:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>
>
> Is there anything else expected from me to move this patch forward?
>
> Uros.
>
Not from my side. I am not sure workflow for this subsystem but, I
believe this needs RB from Jassi. (subsystem maintainer).
>>
>> On 12/16/24 1:16 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/14/24 10:12, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>>> struct zynqmp_ipi_pdata __percpu *pdata is not a per-cpu variable,
>>>> so it should not be annotated with __percpu annotation.
>>>>
>>>> Remove invalid __percpu annotation to fix several
>>>>
>>>> zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.c:920:15: warning: incorrect type in assignment
>>>> (different address spaces)
>>>> zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.c:920:15: expected struct zynqmp_ipi_pdata
>>>> [noderef] __percpu *pdata
>>>> zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.c:920:15: got void *
>>>> zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.c:927:56: warning: incorrect type in argument 3
>>>> (different address spaces)
>>>> zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.c:927:56: expected unsigned int [usertype]
>>>> *out_value
>>>> zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.c:927:56: got unsigned int [noderef] __percpu *
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> and several
>>>>
>>>> drivers/mailbox/zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.c:924:9: warning: dereference of
>>>> noderef expression
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> sparse warnings.
>>>>
>>>> There were no changes in the resulting object file.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>>>> Fixes: 6ffb1635341b ("mailbox: zynqmp: handle SGI for shared IPI")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
>>>> Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
>>>> Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
>>>> Cc: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2: - Fix typo in commit message
>>>> - Add Fixes and Cc: stable.
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/mailbox/zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.c | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/
>>>> zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.c
>>>> index aa5249da59b2..0c143beaafda 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mailbox/zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/zynqmp-ipi-mailbox.c
>>>> @@ -905,7 +905,7 @@ static int zynqmp_ipi_probe(struct platform_device
>>>> *pdev)
>>>> {
>>>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>> struct device_node *nc, *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>>> - struct zynqmp_ipi_pdata __percpu *pdata;
>>>> + struct zynqmp_ipi_pdata *pdata;
>>>> struct of_phandle_args out_irq;
>>>> struct zynqmp_ipi_mbox *mbox;
>>>> int num_mboxes, ret = -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> Tanmay: Please take a look
>>>
>>> I think this patch is correct. Pdata structure is allocated only once
>>> not for every CPU and marking here is not correct. Information from
>>> zynqmp_ipi_pdata are likely fixed and the same for every CPU. Only IRQ
>>> handling is done per cpu basis but that's it.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Michal
>>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists