linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] SRF: Fix offline CPU preventing pc6 entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0j9mx694gN-jk90hHPNDjHHFs-rpwQm2zkeKT_QpAeH9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 17:10:55 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, 
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, 
	rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, len.brown@...el.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] SRF: Fix offline CPU preventing pc6 entry

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 5:02 PM Patryk Wlazlyn
<patryk.wlazlyn@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > * Because version 6.12 is LTS, there is a good chance that users of near-future
> > new platforms will run 6.12 on them.
> > * If a near-future platform happens to miss the firmware workaround for this
> > issue, having these patches in 6.12 will likely mean that most users are OK.
>
> Make sense to me. Any objections to adding "Cc stable v6.12"?

Well, that's not what you add anyway.  "Cc stable" is a maintainer thing.