[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250116170114.GA561930@bhelgaas>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 11:01:14 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
Cc: l.stach@...gutronix.de, bhelgaas@...gle.com, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
kw@...ux.com, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org,
frank.li@....com, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/10] PCI: imx6: Fix the missing reference clock
disable logic
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 03:56:58PM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> Ensure the *_enable_ref_clk() function is symmetric by addressing missing
> disable parts on some platforms.
>
> Fixes: d0a75c791f98 ("PCI: imx6: Factor out ref clock disable to match enable")
The patch below looks fine to me, and I guess it's more than just
making the code prettier; it also actually *fixes* something, right?
It looks like a functional change because imx_pcie_clk_enable() will
now enable the IMX7D refclk when it didn't before, and
imx_pcie_clk_disable() will disable the IMX6SX and IMX8M* refclk when
it didn't before?
But I don't think the Fixes: tag is correct. I looked at uses of
these symbols:
IMX6SX_GPR12_PCIE_TEST_POWERDOWN
enabled by imx6_pcie_enable_ref_clk()
disabled by imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset()
IMX7D_GPR12_PCIE_PHY_REFCLK_SEL
enabled by imx6_pcie_init_phy()
disabled by imx6_pcie_clk_disable()
IMX8MQ_GPR_PCIE_CLK_REQ_OVERRIDE
enabled by imx6_pcie_enable_ref_clk()
As far as I can tell, these uses are identical before and after
d0a75c791f98 ("PCI: imx6: Factor out ref clock disable to match
enable").
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> index 413db182ce9f..ab2c97a8c327 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -599,10 +599,9 @@ static int imx_pcie_attach_pd(struct device *dev)
>
> static int imx6sx_pcie_enable_ref_clk(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, bool enable)
> {
> - if (enable)
> - regmap_clear_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR12,
> - IMX6SX_GPR12_PCIE_TEST_POWERDOWN);
> -
> + regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR12,
> + IMX6SX_GPR12_PCIE_TEST_POWERDOWN,
> + enable ? 0 : IMX6SX_GPR12_PCIE_TEST_POWERDOWN);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -631,19 +630,20 @@ static int imx8mm_pcie_enable_ref_clk(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, bool enable)
> {
> int offset = imx_pcie_grp_offset(imx_pcie);
>
> - if (enable) {
> - regmap_clear_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, offset, IMX8MQ_GPR_PCIE_CLK_REQ_OVERRIDE);
> - regmap_set_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, offset, IMX8MQ_GPR_PCIE_CLK_REQ_OVERRIDE_EN);
> - }
> -
> + regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, offset,
> + IMX8MQ_GPR_PCIE_CLK_REQ_OVERRIDE,
> + enable ? 0 : IMX8MQ_GPR_PCIE_CLK_REQ_OVERRIDE);
> + regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, offset,
> + IMX8MQ_GPR_PCIE_CLK_REQ_OVERRIDE_EN,
> + enable ? IMX8MQ_GPR_PCIE_CLK_REQ_OVERRIDE_EN : 0);
> return 0;
> }
>
> static int imx7d_pcie_enable_ref_clk(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, bool enable)
> {
> - if (!enable)
> - regmap_set_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR12,
> - IMX7D_GPR12_PCIE_PHY_REFCLK_SEL);
> + regmap_update_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR12,
> + IMX7D_GPR12_PCIE_PHY_REFCLK_SEL,
> + enable ? 0 : IMX7D_GPR12_PCIE_PHY_REFCLK_SEL);
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.37.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists