linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Migrate PCI Endpoint Subsystem tests to Kselftest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250116171015.oe67k57qkrg4p3f7@thinkpad>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:40:15 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
Cc: kw@...ux.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
	lpieralisi@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Migrate PCI Endpoint Subsystem tests to Kselftest

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 05:39:30PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> 

[...]

> So the output matched the suggested values in the documentation.
> 
> After this series, the documentation still suggests msi == 16 and msi-x == 8,
> but the example output now shows that
> there was no failures.
> 

Ah, I misunderstood what you meant.

> 
> So I think it is most consistent to just update the example in the same commit (in this series) that updates the output to show everything as good.
> 

Yeah, makes sense. Let me change it in next revision, thanks!

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்