[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250116202434.3783613-10-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 12:24:33 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 10/11] srcu: Add FORCE_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE Kconfig for testing
The srcu_read_lock_nmisafe() and srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe() functions
map to __srcu_read_lock() and __srcu_read_unlock() on systems like x86
that have NMI-safe this_cpu_inc() operations. This makes the underlying
__srcu_read_lock_nmisafe() and __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe() functions
difficult to test on (for example) x86 systems, allowing bugs to creep in.
This commit therefore creates a FORCE_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE Kconfig that
forces those underlying functions to be used even on systems where they
are not needed, thus providing better testing coverage.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
index 80242957fa417..aa42de4d27684 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
@@ -65,6 +65,17 @@ config TREE_SRCU
help
This option selects the full-fledged version of SRCU.
+config FORCE_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE
+ bool "Force selection of NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE"
+ depends on !TINY_SRCU
+ select NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE
+ default n
+ help
+ This option forces selection of the NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE
+ Kconfig option, allowing testing of srcu_read_lock_nmisafe()
+ and srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe() on architectures (like x86)
+ that select the ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS Kconfig option.
+
config NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE
def_bool HAVE_NMI && !ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS && !TINY_SRCU
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists