linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] tracing: gfp: Fix regression of printing GFP flags in user space tracing tooling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250116164840.5f278bbc@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 16:48:40 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland
 <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Michael Petlan
 <mpetlan@...hat.com>, Veronika  Molnarova <vmolnaro@...hat.com>, Suren
 Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Linus Torvalds
 <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] tracing: gfp: Fix regression of printing GFP
 flags in user space tracing tooling

On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 16:41:23 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> This fixes a regression that was brought up last year[1], but due
> to missing a response it was forgotten about.

Note, these were only tested by building and booting the kernel to see if
the gfp_flags have been fixed. I did not run this through my normal tests.

I can run them, and if I get an Ack from the memory maintainers I could
push them through my tree.

I would also like to have those that reported the issue confirm this fixes
the problem for them and they give me a "Tested-by".

-- Steve