[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABgObfYpyUT=HubreEO1=HzSdsCwnJs6QTj6weibJ4wqYZ_W3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 12:07:00 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
Cc: seanjc@...gle.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, kai.huang@...el.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
reinette.chatre@...el.com, xiaoyao.li@...el.com, tony.lindgren@...el.com,
binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com, dmatlack@...gle.com, isaku.yamahata@...el.com,
isaku.yamahata@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: TDX SEPT SEAMCALL retry
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 1:53 AM Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com> wrote:
> For the first, hmm, a bad thing is that though
> tdh_mem_sept_add()/tdh_mem_page_aug()/tdh_mem_sept_add() all need to handle
> TDX_OPERAND_BUSY, the one for tdh_mem_page_aug() has already been squashed
> into the MMU part 2.
>
> If you like, maybe I can extract the one for tdh_mem_page_aug() and merge it
> with 1+5.
That works for me, but if it's easier for you to merge the fixups in
the respective base patches that's okay too.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists