[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025011643-cymbal-gruffly-d83d@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 16:39:55 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] PM: Revert "Add EXPORT macros for exporting PM
functions"
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 05:32:23PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 04:24:16PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 05:21:51PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > > #define _EXPORT_DEV_PM_OPS(name, license, ns) _EXPORT_PM_OPS(name, license, ns)
> > > -#define EXPORT_PM_FN_GPL(name) EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(name)
> > > -#define EXPORT_PM_FN_NS_GPL(name, ns) EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(name, "ns")
> > > #else
> > > #define _EXPORT_DEV_PM_OPS(name, license, ns) _DISCARD_PM_OPS(name, license, ns)
> > > -#define EXPORT_PM_FN_GPL(name)
> > > -#define EXPORT_PM_FN_NS_GPL(name, ns)
> >
> > Why not start using them instead?
>
> I tried and they didn't produce what we want (code elimination for
> the CONFIG_PM=n).
Ok, then please say that in the changelog text.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists