[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250117210418.GA10948@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 22:04:18 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
Cc: "mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"lucas.demarchi@...el.com" <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>,
"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com" <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"irogers@...gle.com" <irogers@...gle.com>,
"adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"kan.liang@...ux.intel.com" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/19] perf: Make perf_pmu_unregister() useable
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 02:04:23PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Anyway, let me go break this up into individual patches and go test
> this -- after lunch!
OK, so aside from a few dumb mistakes, the result seems to hold up with
your tinypmu testcase. I left it running for about 30 minutes.
I pushed out the latest patches to queue/perf/pmu-unregister
Powered by blists - more mailing lists