linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/8] device mapper atomic write support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4c5d02d6-a798-a390-2743-088c31c8965f@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 22:27:22 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>
cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>, axboe@...nel.dk, agk@...hat.com, 
    hch@....de, song@...nel.org, yukuai3@...wei.com, kbusch@...nel.org, 
    sagi@...mberg.me, James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, 
    martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, 
    dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
    linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, 
    linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/8] device mapper atomic write support



On Fri, 17 Jan 2025, Mike Snitzer wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 05:02:53PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> > This series introduces initial device mapper atomic write support.
> > 
> > Since we already support stacking atomic writes limits, it's quite
> > straightforward to support.
> > 
> > Personalities dm-linear, dm-stripe, and dm-raid1 are supported here, and
> > more personalities could be supported in future.
> > 
> > This is still an RFC as I would like to test further.
> > 
> > Based on 3d9a9e9a77c5 (block/for-6.14/block) block: limit disk max
> > sectors to (LLONG_MAX >> 9)
> > 
> > Changes to v1:
> > - Generic block layer atomic writes enable flag and dm-table rework
> > - Add dm-stripe and dm-raid1 support
> > - Add bio_trim() patch
> 
> This all looks good.
> 
> Mikulas, we need Jens to pick up patches 1 and 2.  I wouldn't be
> opposed to him taking the entire set but I did notice the DM core
> (ioctl) version and the 3 DM targets that have had atomic support
> added need their version numbers bumped.  Given that, likely best for
> you (Mikulas) to pick up patches 3-8 after rebasing on Jens' latest
> for-6.14/block branch (once Jens picks up patches 1 and 2).
> 
> Jens, you cool with picking up patches 1+2 for 6.14?  Or too late and
> we circle back to this for 6.15?
> 
> Either way, for the series:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>

Hi

I rebased on Jens' block tree, applied the patches 3-8, increased 
DM_VERSION_MINOR, DM_VERSION_EXTRA, increased version numbers in 
dm-linear, dm-stripe, dm-raid1 and uploaded it to git.kernel.org.

You can check it if it's correct.

Mikulas