[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y0z9j0ha.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 09:41:53 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jinjie Ruan
<ruanjinjie@...wei.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Amit
Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] spi: zynqmp-gqspi: Allow interrupting operations
Hello Sean,
On 16/01/2025 at 17:55:20 -05, Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev> wrote:
> Some operations (such as reading several megabytes of data from a flash)
> can take several seconds or more. Users may want to cancel such
> operations. Allow them to do so now that we have a way to recover.
I fully agree with the observation, I tried myself interrupting too long
transfers with another spi controller:
e0205d6203c2c ("spi: atmel: Prevent false timeouts on long transfers")
But there were issues reported, so we limited the signals to SIGKILLs:
1ca2761a77349 ("spi: atmel: Do not cancel a transfer upon any signal")
But jffs2 plays with sigkills, so for spi memories it does not work
well, we had to revert:
890188d2d7e4a ("spi: atmel: Prevent spi transfers from being killed")
Same thing was also observed on Zynq7000:
26cfc0dbe43aa ("spi: spi-zynq-qspi: use wait_for_completion_timeout to make zynq_qspi_exec_mem_op not interruptible")
I would however hint to use a specific helper for deriving your timeouts
if you play with spi memories, because it is interesting to adapt the
values nevertheless:
d8e4ebf870187 ("spi: Create a helper to derive adaptive timeouts")
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists