[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <678a21a9388ae_3e503c294f4@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 04:23:53 -0500
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@...nix.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@...nix.com>,
Andrew Melnychenko <andrew@...nix.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
gur.stavi@...wei.com,
devel@...nix.com,
Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@...nix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 9/9] tap: Use tun's vnet-related code
Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> tun and tap implements the same vnet-related features so reuse the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@...nix.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/net/Makefile | 6 +-
> drivers/net/tap.c | 152 +++++--------------------------------------------
> drivers/net/tun_vnet.c | 5 ++
> 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 140 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/Kconfig b/drivers/net/Kconfig
> index 1fd5acdc73c6..c420418473fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/Kconfig
> @@ -395,6 +395,7 @@ config TUN
> tristate "Universal TUN/TAP device driver support"
> depends on INET
> select CRC32
> + select TAP
> help
> TUN/TAP provides packet reception and transmission for user space
> programs. It can be viewed as a simple Point-to-Point or Ethernet
> diff --git a/drivers/net/Makefile b/drivers/net/Makefile
> index bb8eb3053772..2275309a97ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/net/Makefile
> @@ -29,9 +29,9 @@ obj-y += mdio/
> obj-y += pcs/
> obj-$(CONFIG_RIONET) += rionet.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_NET_TEAM) += team/
> -obj-$(CONFIG_TUN) += tun-drv.o
> -tun-drv-y := tun.o tun_vnet.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_TAP) += tap.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_TUN) += tun.o
Is reversing the previous changes to tun.ko intentional?
Perhaps the previous approach with a new CONFIG_TUN_VNET is preferable
over this. In particular over making TUN select TAP, a new dependency.
> +obj-$(CONFIG_TAP) += tap-drv.o
> +tap-drv-y := tap.o tun_vnet.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_VETH) += veth.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_NET) += virtio_net.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_VXLAN) += vxlan/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists