[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef3f7784-7129-436a-a5f7-1630b278b101@orange.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 16:28:32 +0100
From: Alexandre Ferrieux <alexandre.ferrieux@...il.com>
To: Alexandre Ferrieux <alexandre.ferrieux@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-trace-users@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: Bug: broken /proc/kcore in 6.13
On 17/01/2025 16:19, Alexandre Ferrieux wrote:
> On 17/01/2025 15:44, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>>> Alexandre Ferrieux <alexandre.ferrieux@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Somewhere in the 6.13 branch (not bisected yet, sorry), it stopped being
>>>> possible to disassemble the running kernel from gdb through /proc/kcore.
>> Thanks for the report! Much appreciated.
>>
>> I may try to bisect here also unless you're close to finding the commit that
>> broke this?
>
> I'm currently homing in on copy_page_to_iter_nofault(), will report shortly :)
Hmm, actually, that baby ain't cooperative:
[Fri Jan 17 15:23:05 2025] trace_kprobe: Could not probe notrace function
copy_page_to_iter_nofault
... if I cannot insert kprobes to sniff around, I'm a bit stuck :}
So I think you'll reach the goal faster than me !
PS: For your bisection: the last working kernel I know of is Debian's 6.12 final:
ii linux-image-6.12.9-amd64 6.12.9-1 amd64
Linux 6.12 for 64-bit PCs (signed)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists