lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51b75b0a-7725-4634-9a05-8caa392eaef8@igalia.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 09:00:52 +0900
From: Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
Cc: tj@...nel.org, void@...ifault.com, kernel-dev@...lia.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] sched_ext: Implement event counter infrastructure and
 add an event

Hello,

Thank you for the suggestion, Andrea!

On 25. 1. 17. 18:49, Andrea Righi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 12:15:37AM +0900, Changwoo Min wrote:
> ...
>> +/*
>> + * The event counter is organized by a per-CPU variable to minimize the
>> + * accounting overhead without synchronization. A system-wide view on the
>> + * event counter is constructed when requested by scx_bpf_get_event_stat().
>> + */
>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct scx_event_stat, event_stats);
> 
> Should we consider tracking these statistics per-scheduler rather than
> globally (like adding scx_event_stat to sched_ext_ops)?
> 
> It's not particularly important for now, but in the future, if we allow
> multiple scx schedulers to be loaded at the same time, tracking separate
> stats per-scheduler would be preferable.

It will be useful to get per-scheduler information. Since how the
scheduler composability will be embodied is wide open at this
point, I will revisit the interface design as the composability
design gets more concrete.

Regards,
Changwoo Min



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ