[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2417745.NG923GbCHz@jernej-laptop>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 12:45:45 +0100
From: Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] watchdog: sunxi_wdt: Add support for Allwinner A523
Dne ponedeljek, 11. november 2024 ob 02:30:23 Srednjeevropski standardni čas je Andre Przywara napisal(a):
> The Allwinner A523 SoC comes with a watchdog very similar to the ones in
> the previous Allwinner SoCs, but oddly enough moves the first half of its
> registers up by one word. Since we have different offsets for these
> registers across the other SoCs as well, this can simply be modelled by
> just stating the new offsets in our per-SoC struct.
> The rest of the IP is the same as in the D1, although the A523 moves its
> watchdog to a separate MMIO frame, so it's not embedded in the timer
> anymore. The driver can be ignorant of this, because the DT will take
> care of this.
>
> Add a new struct for the A523, specifying the SoC-specific details, and
> tie the new DT compatible string to it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
Best regards,
Jernej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists