lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250118005552.2626804-3-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 16:55:44 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, 
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, Paul Durrant <paul@....org>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	syzbot+352e553a86e0d75f5120@...kaller.appspotmail.com, 
	Paul Durrant <pdurrant@...zon.com>, David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>, 
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/10] KVM: x86: Eliminate "handling" of impossible errors
 during SUSPEND

Drop KVM's handling of kvm_set_guest_paused() failure when reacting to a
SUSPEND notification, as kvm_set_guest_paused() only "fails" if the vCPU
isn't using kvmclock, and KVM's notifier callback pre-checks that kvmclock
is active.  I.e. barring some bizarre edge case that shouldn't be treated
as an error in the first place, kvm_arch_suspend_notifier() can't fail.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 20 +++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 26e18c9b0375..ef21158ec6b2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -6905,21 +6905,15 @@ static int kvm_arch_suspend_notifier(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	unsigned long i;
-	int ret = 0;
 
-	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
-		if (!vcpu->arch.pv_time.active)
-			continue;
+	/*
+	 * Ignore the return, marking the guest paused only "fails" if the vCPU
+	 * isn't using kvmclock; continuing on is correct and desirable.
+	 */
+	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
+		(void)kvm_set_guest_paused(vcpu);
 
-		ret = kvm_set_guest_paused(vcpu);
-		if (ret) {
-			kvm_err("Failed to pause guest VCPU%d: %d\n",
-				vcpu->vcpu_id, ret);
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-
-	return ret ? NOTIFY_BAD : NOTIFY_DONE;
+	return NOTIFY_DONE;
 }
 
 int kvm_arch_pm_notifier(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long state)
-- 
2.48.0.rc2.279.g1de40edade-goog


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ