[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250118-therapeutic-peach-turaco-99b37e@krzk-bin>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 15:41:51 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Aleksandar Rikalo <arikalo@...il.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>, Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: mips: mips-cm: Add a new compatible
string for EyeQ6
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 10:46:00AM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> >> - const: mti,mips-cm
> >> + oneOf:
> >> + - const: mti,mips-cm
> >> + - const: mti,eyeq6-cm
> >
> > Being a mobileye device, the vendor prefix should be mobileye.
>
> I chose mti because actually this block is part of the I6500 and
> provided as is by MIPS.
But MIPS or MTI did not create eyeq6, so then product does not fit
vendor.
>
> >
> >> + description:
> >> + On EyeQ6 the HCI (Hardware Cache Initialization) information for
> >> + the L2 cache in multi-cluster configuration is broken.
> >>
> >> reg:
> >> description:
> >> @@ -25,14 +30,29 @@ properties:
> >>
> >> required:
> >> - compatible
> >> - - reg
> >>
> >> additionalProperties: false
> >>
> >> +if:
> >> + properties:
> >> + compatible:
> >> + contains:
> >> + const: mti,eyeq6-cm
> >> +then:
> >> + properties:
> >> + reg: false
> >> +else:
> >> + required:
> >> + - reg
> >
> > How does one access this block with no registers? Is this some subset of
> > a larger block? If so, need to define that block first.
>
> CM stands for Coherence Manager. This component is mandatory when you
> want to do SMP across MIPS core. This is part of the MIPS architecture,
> and the address of the CM is provided by the Coprocessor 0.
>
> "CP0 is incorporated on the CPU chip and supports the virtual memory
> system and exception handling. CP0 is also referred to as the System
> Control Coprocessor."
>
> So to summarize, in a functional system, this information doesn't have
> to be exposed through the device tree, as it is available at runtime
> from any MIPS CPU.
>
> >
> > These 2 blocks don't look related and the only property shared is
> > 'compatible'. This should be a separate doc.
>
> As mentioned in the cover letter, I reused the work from Jiaxun, who
> needed to deal with bogus CM but in a different way. In his use case,
> the issue with the CM was that the address in CP0 was wrong. In my case,
> this address is correct; it is only one piece of information reported by
> the CM that is wrong. I don't mind creating a separate doc if you
> still think it is the right thing to do.
So the programming interface in general is the same, but in one case the
reg/address detection does not work reliably?
I guess could stay the same doc, but all this should be explained in
binding description.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists