lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <365c47d1-6b19-452a-b4f7-ca8a64e2754f@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 19:28:48 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: "Mukunda,Vijendar" <vijendar.mukunda@....com>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz,
	tiwai@...e.com, Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@....com,
	Sunil-kumar.Dommati@....com, venkataprasad.potturu@....com,
	linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 12/23] ASoC: amd: acp70: add acp ip interrupt handler

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 12:47:18PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> On 1/20/2025 12:39, Mark Brown wrote:

> > That does feel like quirks and new features rather than a completely
> > distinct IP.

> I see it as different forms of tech debt.  Either you keep track of which
> features the 62 vs 70 hardware supports by different drivers or add logic in
> all the relevant functions().

> The former increases LoC but reduces risk for mistake (IE avoid oops, I
> forgot this is only supported on 70+ when adding new features).

Until someone fixes a bug or does some subsystem wide cleanup which
affects both copies of the code (perhaps that already happened since the
code was copied!).  There's a reason why this is the general kernel
style.

> Changing code that affects a lot of hardware means a lot more testing too.
> Perhaps after Vijendar's series lands he can split up some of the purely
> duplicated functions into helpers or callbacks and arrange all that testing?

Well, it was getting a new spin anyway for the bits that didn't have the
serial numbers filed off.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ