[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3613bdb9-a933-4027-89e9-03a261410f68@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 21:16:50 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: liuye <liuye@...inos.cn>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm/cow : Fix memory leak in
child_vmsplice_memcmp_fn()
On 15.01.25 06:45, liuye wrote:
>
> 在 2025/1/14 18:23, David Hildenbrand 写道:
>> On 14.01.25 03:29, liuye wrote:
>>> Release memory before exception branch returns to prevent memory
>>> leaks.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: liuye <liuye@...inos.cn>
>>> ---
>>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c
>>> b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c
>>> index 1238e1c5aae1..959327ba6258 100644
>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c
>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c
>>> @@ -167,19 +167,30 @@ static int child_vmsplice_memcmp_fn(char *mem,
>>> size_t size,
>>> /* Backup the original content. */
>>> memcpy(old, mem, size);
>>> - if (pipe(fds) < 0)
>>> + if (pipe(fds) < 0) {
>>> + free(old);
>>> + free(new);
>>> return -errno;
>>> -
>>> + }
>>> /* Trigger a read-only pin. */
>>> transferred = vmsplice(fds[1], &iov, 1, 0);
>>> - if (transferred < 0)
>>> + if (transferred < 0) {
>>> + free(old);
>>> + free(new);
>>> return -errno;
>>> - if (transferred == 0)
>>> + }
>>> + if (transferred == 0) {
>>> + free(old);
>>> + free(new);
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> /* Unmap it from our page tables. */
>>> - if (munmap(mem, size) < 0)
>>> + if (munmap(mem, size) < 0) {
>>> + free(old);
>>> + free(new);
>>> return -errno;
>>> + }
>>
>> We are immediately exiting the test in do_test_cow_in_parent()
>> exit(fn(mem, size, &comm_pipes));
>>
>> Your changes make the code unnecessarily more complicated to read, so
>> I'm not in favor of this one to make some checker tool happy.
>>
>
> It is indeed exiting the process. After the process exits, the memory
> will be reclaimed naturally.
>
> As code in the kernel branch, it will be used by beginners, such as me,
> for learning. Modifications are recommended.
>
> Regarding the readability of the code, is the following modification
> better than before?
>
>
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c
> b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c
> index 1238e1c5aae1..db5e71c5bf2f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c
> @@ -167,19 +167,21 @@ static int child_vmsplice_memcmp_fn(char *mem,
> size_t size,
> /* Backup the original content. */
> memcpy(old, mem, size);
>
> - if (pipe(fds) < 0)
> - return -errno;
> + if (pipe(fds) < 0)
> + goto free;
>
> /* Trigger a read-only pin. */
> transferred = vmsplice(fds[1], &iov, 1, 0);
> - if (transferred < 0)
> - return -errno;
> - if (transferred == 0)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (transferred < 0)
> + goto free;
> + if (transferred == 0) {
> + error = EINVAL;
> + goto free;
> + }
>
> /* Unmap it from our page tables. */
> if (munmap(mem, size) < 0)
> - return -errno;
> + goto free;
>
> /* Wait until the parent modified it. */
> write(comm_pipes->child_ready[1], "0", 1);
> @@ -194,6 +196,10 @@ static int child_vmsplice_memcmp_fn(char *mem,
> size_t size,
> }
>
> return memcmp(old, new, transferred);
> +free:
> + free(old);
> + free(new);
> + return -error;
> }
As an alternative, we can replace all return statements by explicit exit() ?
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists