[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d08136ac-e08f-4e5d-b562-78529f34d86f@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 08:21:49 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@...ogic.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add support for Amlogic SoCs
On 20/01/2025 06:57, Xianwei Zhao wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> Thanks for reply.
>
> On 2025/1/17 16:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 02:41:59PM +0800, Xianwei Zhao wrote:
>>> +properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + const: amlogic,pinctrl-a4
>>> +
>>> + "#address-cells":
>>> + const: 2
>>> +
>>> + "#size-cells":
>>> + const: 2
>>
>> Why this moved to '2'? 32-bit was not enough?
>>
> Previously only represented a register address offset value, now
> directly represents a register, through 'ranges" which to represent.
> 32-bit is enough, but since APB bus is defined as 64-bit, here is
Changelog was silent on this.
> following. I increase support for 32-bit. Like the following values:
No, just keep one of these.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists